Having high impact factor scores could help you attract more university funding, better papers, researches, editors, which lead to better metrics in terms of publications and citations.
The short answer is it depends. In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1. Check out this article to see what good looks like in 27 science categories.
The article is also a great resource for people to understand more about the sometimes controversial indicator. It looks into our database of some 13,000 journals with a number of citations per year. Most importantly, it’s free and open access.
Science shouldn’t be just about funding, metrics, papers, and citations. Science isn’t just about numbers. It might start with a university or a lab, but it should end with a real impact on society.
But, what is doesn’t always agree with what should be.
We have identified 19 ways in 3 types of strategies to improve the number of citations that lead to the journal impact factor.
By reviewing these methods, you could improve the quality of your publication, get more citations, learn strategies, e.g., using special issues, case reports, tailoring your publications for a specific university, index, or editors.
Good authorities are often highly cited as they tend to have more original articles, more cited papers, and a higher number of publications. People are more likely to reference the research for topical relevance.
One way to compensate for low impact factors is to highlight affiliations with a good reputation in the community. JSTOR is affiliated with ITHAKA. It is a non-profit organization that aids academic institutions using digital tech.
You should make sure your authors provide a good article summary that includes context, hypotheses, methodologies, key findings, interpretations, stated questions, etc.
Turn it into a simple blurb with one or two lines that allow for quick scanning and be enjoyable for researchers to read the summary and scroll further down.
If you have a niche scientific focus, target those scientists accordingly. Tailoring your publication for scientists with a special focus is more likely to improve citation from them. You may also target scientific researchers from a university, focus on a system, or a society.
Assuming you have a good editor, you should receive more citations because your scientific papers and publications are more relevant. For example, take this article that brings Covid and Cancer together.
The science community tends to trust peer-reviewers more. Peer-reviewers tend to be experts in the same field as the author. Authors who can pass the peer-review process tend to produce a better quality of their work. So, there is no guesswork involved on the reader’s part regarding citing their article.
Develop new article types to attract a diverse range of authors.
For instance, commission special issues a couple of times a year. This includes curated collections on a single topic. These ideas will encourage authors to submit to journals that they otherwise may not consider. For example, here is a curated collection on Social Tourism.
A scientific journal based on specific topics can get more targeted traffic which can increase citations.
Make sure that the title and the scope are descriptive and intuitive for readers and potential authors. The scope should clearly state the type of manuscripts, topics, and formats that are welcome. Allowing authors to submit their manuscripts in a variety of formats can attract more submissions.
An editor’s job should not end once an article is published. Promote your articles to increase awareness, attract citations, and improve usage. Invest time and effort into a marketing mechanism that works for your niche.
Talented authors are usually picky about the journals they approach for publication. Encourage them to publish their best articles in your journal by projecting clear standards.
For example, list the affiliations, list of names, and contact details of the key staff on the online and print versions of the journal.
This includes the Editor and the Editorial Board Members.
Make sure you have clear ethics policies and a process to enforce them. Improve journal credibility by joining reputable organizations such as the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). It will bolster its commitment to quality.
Articles that are published weeks after the submission date can become obsolete. Fresh and recent studies are more likely to be cited than outdated articles. Make sure your review process works efficiently - shorter turnaround times tend to attract more article submissions.
A journal’s scope is a big factor, upon which researchers make decisions for a journal within their target pool. While the journal should publish a diverse range of topics, allowing certain specialties or focusing on a niche will also prove productive.
How? By specializing in a certain topic or field, your journal will be the go-to resource for research or citations for target researchers.
One of the trending methods is changing the price factor of the journal. Readers and researchers, in general, take minutes to scan an article and move on to the next. If they encounter a paywall or are asked to provide a review before moving onto the next article, they abandon the journal.
Make some of your articles free and accessible to prevent this from happening.
Display ads can be an excellent way to monetize a journal. Just be mindful of the impact on user experience. For instance, avoid having pop-up ads every few minutes. You also don’t want to distract them from the content they are researching.
Articles that are SEO optimized pop up on the first page of search results. By educating authors about how they can optimize their content, you can indirectly attract more readers and thus citations.
Optimizing academic articles is called Academic Search Engine Optimization (ASEO). It ensures that all research content is visible online and also ranks high in results displayed by popular search engines. Besides Google, this also includes Google Scholar.
Try to get your journal included in several niche indices to increase its rank. Open databases are available for free. If your journal has a low impact factor, start by adding it to this index. These give more weight to content quality rather than publishing history.
As your IF improves, switch to commercial indexes.
These are the best way to get your journal discovered by target readers. These require a paid subscription and each has its own criteria for inclusion. High-quality peer-reviewed content, consistent publishing history, and a strong editorial board are essential for inclusion.
Review articles that discuss published literature can entice readers and thus attract more citations. High impact topics that are compiled in a special issue can also provide the same benefit, just faster. Of course, promoting both approaches can also attract target readers.
While high levels of self-citation are frowned upon, authors can cite research from older published articles. Encourage reviewers to check out submitted papers and make references to the journal when they cite them.
However, don’t make journal self-citation a rule.
It is an unethical practice that may negatively impact the journal’s impact factor.
There is a Chinese saying that basically means: No martial arts can beat speed. The truth is there what works for someone may not always work for another. You may need to be willing to experiment. Take what is useful and discard what is not. Adopt to your system. Keep moving. Take a page from Bruce Lee.
If you haven’t heard the word citation repeated like that, you are probably too young to understand the special relationship we have with citation. If publishing a paper is king, then citation is the queen.
A citation is a token of the influence of your paper.
Having highly cited papers helps a researcher’s career. A university may use the number of citations, articles published, papers, quality of paper, contribution to publishing or special issue, diversity of citations and papers, and impact factors of papers cited to measure performance.
A university professor will be proud to have articles or just a paper published in journals with a high impact factor.
One of DORA’ statements reads: “Do not use journal-based metrics, such as Journal Impact Factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.”
What does this tell you?
People do use Journal Impact Factors to measure the quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist’s contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions.
Alternative metrics have been emerging and getting some attention. But, a journal impact factor is still the key measure for the quality of a publication. Journal editors love having great authors to cite in relation to the articles publishes or papers published.
It’s our hope to use this post to level the playing field. We are constantly looking and collecting ideas that could help you grow your influence. We look forward to learning from your experience.
May your papers get cited more.